So Joe Biden is officially cutting off aid to an ally at war, after sabotaging their war effort at every step, for nakedly political reasons. Impeach, remove from office.
This analysis relies on the assumption that the current administration's foreign policy is being run by steady hands capable of strategic, long term thinking on multiple levels, and guided by the best interests of the United States and it's allies.
I see no evidence backing up this assumption, and plenty to the contrary.
Netanyahu has implied that a reduction in access to precision weaponry will result in more civilian casualties: "We are doing everything we can to let the people leave, with amazing efforts. But, I think also that this is precision - precision weapons. So, in fact, if you want to avoid civilian casualties, you need these weapons, rather than imprecise weaponry"
To me this feels like an excuse to some degree or another. I don't know the first thing of military strategy, but I'm pretty sure treating civilian casualties as a tolerated expectation rather than an incident to avoid at all cost risks setting further precedent for reckless operations in civilian occupied zones.
So Joe Biden is officially cutting off aid to an ally at war, after sabotaging their war effort at every step, for nakedly political reasons. Impeach, remove from office.
Gosh I hate Joe Biden on so many levels.
It's not 4D chess when it is blatantly obvious. Biden can't handle 1D checkers at this point.
This analysis relies on the assumption that the current administration's foreign policy is being run by steady hands capable of strategic, long term thinking on multiple levels, and guided by the best interests of the United States and it's allies.
I see no evidence backing up this assumption, and plenty to the contrary.
Wow, everything is a wheel within a wheel. I really appreciate this kind of analysis, Ryran. And I love Biden on so many levels (except his age).
Will there be any commentary about the 'intel' that the Biden administration withheld from the IDF? That's a confusing topic for me.
You mentioned not being able to get High resolution footage of Gaza. That is likely because of the Kyl–Bingaman Amendment.
Very interesting perspective, Sean Bell over at Sky News, has a very similar view. You can watch here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-prKO_SC-Kg
Netanyahu has implied that a reduction in access to precision weaponry will result in more civilian casualties: "We are doing everything we can to let the people leave, with amazing efforts. But, I think also that this is precision - precision weapons. So, in fact, if you want to avoid civilian casualties, you need these weapons, rather than imprecise weaponry"
To me this feels like an excuse to some degree or another. I don't know the first thing of military strategy, but I'm pretty sure treating civilian casualties as a tolerated expectation rather than an incident to avoid at all cost risks setting further precedent for reckless operations in civilian occupied zones.
Biden the HAMASSHOLE
It's an embargo