Now I'm just a Data Science student, who is more focused on the math behind AI than implementation, but I would humbly like to expand why having a model is beneficial, all the photos from the database have another thing in common, they are the center of attention in a war it is verly likely we wouldn't want our tools out in the open, additionally the ideas of lighting come into play, and also having drones that you are training taking the data is far better than the intermediary of a camera.
Once again, Ryan is on the ball, ferreting out the BS and bringing a logical and reasonable perspective to the interweb of foolish conjecture and out right lies
A shotgun might work with a single FPV drone coming at you but we're gonna need some sort of EMP device to fry a drone swarm. I'm not sure even a laser defense system with AI assisted targeting could take out a large swarm fast enough. Then the EMP system need to operate in such a way it doesn't fry friendly equipment. I'm not even sure at this point. It seems like the current tactics being used are on the way to being as obsolete as marching line abreast in the US Civil War.
Electro magnetic pulse or EMP is not yet controlled or aimed if you send a small nuclear device into low earth orbit and set it off in the general area it will produce an electro-magnetic pulse but if your equipment isn’t shielded and you have lots of satellite’s then everything in the neighborhood will be fried extra crispy and stop working that means anything with computers car’s trucks ignition systems generators are susceptible to EMP.
Today, I Iearned from Ryan McBeth how China could use AI programming to build Drone swarms for killing Patriot Air Defense systems and why I was given the nickname "Magnitude of Two" in Boot Camp.
Now I'm just a Data Science student, who is more focused on the math behind AI than implementation, but I would humbly like to expand why having a model is beneficial, all the photos from the database have another thing in common, they are the center of attention in a war it is verly likely we wouldn't want our tools out in the open, additionally the ideas of lighting come into play, and also having drones that you are training taking the data is far better than the intermediary of a camera.
And in all likelihood, somewhere, someone(s) is doing just this for any and all things the warped and twisted mentality of humans can think up
Once again, Ryan is on the ball, ferreting out the BS and bringing a logical and reasonable perspective to the interweb of foolish conjecture and out right lies
A shotgun might work with a single FPV drone coming at you but we're gonna need some sort of EMP device to fry a drone swarm. I'm not sure even a laser defense system with AI assisted targeting could take out a large swarm fast enough. Then the EMP system need to operate in such a way it doesn't fry friendly equipment. I'm not even sure at this point. It seems like the current tactics being used are on the way to being as obsolete as marching line abreast in the US Civil War.
Electro magnetic pulse or EMP is not yet controlled or aimed if you send a small nuclear device into low earth orbit and set it off in the general area it will produce an electro-magnetic pulse but if your equipment isn’t shielded and you have lots of satellite’s then everything in the neighborhood will be fried extra crispy and stop working that means anything with computers car’s trucks ignition systems generators are susceptible to EMP.
Today, I Iearned from Ryan McBeth how China could use AI programming to build Drone swarms for killing Patriot Air Defense systems and why I was given the nickname "Magnitude of Two" in Boot Camp.
How far we as a warring people we have come in my lifetime is sometimes like science fiction.